Comment on the Repeal of the Roadless Rule by October 6th
Roadless national forest lands like the Badger-Two Medicine and northern Swan Range are under assault. The Forest Service plans to eliminate the 2001 Roadless Rule, a highly effective conservation policy, that limits roadbuilding and commercial logging on 45 million acres of intact national forest lands across the country, including more than 6 million acres here in Montana. We need your help to stop this destructive giveaway to private industry.
For 25 years, the Roadless Rule has helped keep our national forests wild and intact, provided vital habitat and migratory corridors for wildlife, maintained intact watersheds that provide clean drinking water to communities across the country, including Essex, supported Tribal treaty rights and cultural resource protection, and created opportunities for quiet, backcountry recreation. At the same time, the Rule provides the Forest Service with flexibility to address wildfire, insects and disease, or restore fish and wildlife habitat.
What’s at Stake
Make no mistake, this proposal is not about better forest management or community wildfire protection. Rather it is all about giving away some of our last, intact wild forests to logging, mining, and oil and gas companies to exploit for private profit.
The repeal of the Rule could lead to damaging new road building, logging, mining or industrial development. Ironically, the repeal would likely increase the risk of wildfire to our communities as wildfires are four times more likely to start in roaded areas than roadless ones. Other consequences include loss of habitat and habitat security for elk, mule deer, grizzly bears and other species, reduced water quality, greater spread of invasive species, lost opportunity for quiet backcountry recreation, including hunting, fishing or hiking, and loss of revenue for outfitters and other outdoor businesses. Healthy intact forests, wildlife, and our communities, benefit greatly from the Roadless Rule. Please comment in favor of keeping the existing rule by October 6th.
Protect roadless national forest lands
Tell the Forest Service to Keep the Roadless Area Conservation Rule.
Comments due October 6, 2026
Suggested Talking Points
- Tell the Forest Service to select the “No Action Alternative” to keep the existing rule!
- Let the Forest Service and national decision-makers know what you would lose if roadless areas, like the Badger-Two Medicine or Swan Range, went away. Some ideas to share include how road building and drilling and logging across millions of acres of roadless lands in Montana would impact you and your way of life: wildlife habitat, quiet recreation, hunting or fishing, aesthetics, healthy native forests, berry picking, or other cultural values or uses.
- Roadless areas provide some of the best, most secure habitat for fish and wildlife, as well as key connectivity areas and migration corridors. Many of our most beloved and iconic species, including elk, mule deer, grizzly bears, Canada lynx, moose and bull trout rely extensively on roadless areas. Roadbuilding and industrial development would lead to loss of habitat, increased human-caused mortality, and other impacts that will harm our wildlife and make recovering threatened or endangered species that much harder.
- According to the draft Environmental Impact Statement, new roads will lead to significantly more wildfires - not less - imperiling our communities and forests across Montana. New roads are also famous for spreading invasive species and noxious weeds and have real potential to degrade drinking water supplies for 60 million Americans including the community of Essex, and have long term negative effects on Tribal sacred sites and treaty-reserved resources.
- Building roads into environmentally sensitive areas makes no economic sense. The Forest Service already has an approximately $6 billion deferred maintenance backlog on its 370,000 mile road network. We should not destroy some of our last remaining wild country to subsidize road building so that timber and oil and gas companies can take over our public lands.
How to Submit Comment
Or by mail:
Director, Ecosystem Management Coordination
201 14th Street SW, Mailstop 1108
Washington, D.C. 20250-1124
Learn More
These two podcasts from the Wild Idea Media provide a great overview of the Rule and What’s at Stake:
- Chris Wood: Why We Have The Roadless Rule (Redux)
- Peter Metcalf and Terry Tatsey: Blackfeet Nation Stewardship and a Living Landscape in the Badger–Two Medicine
Download and read the draft Environmental Impact Statement.
Re(opens in new tab)
Read our Roadless Rule FAQ for more info.
Want to do More?
- Ask your friends and family to comment by October 6th.
- Comment on the Travel Management Rule by Sept. 23rd.
- Call your Congressional delegation, tell them you support public lands and the Roadless Rule, and demand that they introduce and pass federal legislation that would protect our public lands, starting with the “Roadless Area Conservation Act.”
